Gov. Rick Scott rejects federal high-speed rail funding. What do you think?
Sean Kinane about about 3 years ago
Here's the statement we just received from the Governor's office.
Florida Governor Rick Scott Rejects Federal High Speed Rail
Tallahassee, Fla. â After thoughtful consideration, Governor Rick Scott informed U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood of the stateâs decision to reject President Obamaâs Tampa to Orlando high-speed rail project.
Below are Governor Scottâs Remarks as Prepared:
Â·As you know, I was elected to get Floridians back to work and to change the way government does business in our state.
Â·I am committed to making good on those promises.
Â·Recently, I sent a budget proposal to the legislature that reduces the size and scope of government; reduces the costs of that government and passes those cost savings on to taxpayers so that we can create new jobs and turn Floridaâs economy around.
Â·I believe when you reduce governmentâs reach and hold that government accountable, you create an environment where the economy can flourish.
Â·When you reduce taxes and put that money back in the hands of hardworking Floridians and Florida businesses, that money will be spent on creating private sector jobs
Â·As you know, my background is in business, not politics. But you donât have to be an economics expert to understand that if you spend more money than you take in, your business will fail.
Â·Unfortunately, politicians havenât always seemed to grasp that same principle.
Â·In fact, the Obama administration just announced a $3.73 trillion budget that includes the largest budget deficit in our nationâs history ($1.65 trillion).
Â·The presidentâs budget includes $1.6 trillion in higher taxes.
Â·Those higher taxes will impact Floridians and our competitiveness worldwide. We cannot expect individuals to build businesses in America if our taxes are higher than other countries.
Â·Higher taxes and more government spending is a recipe for disaster. Government has become addicted to spending beyond its means and we cannot continue this flawed policy.
Â·Let us never forget, whether it is Washington or Tallahassee, government has no resources of its own. Government can only give to us what it has previously taken from us.
Â·That is why today I am announcing my decision to reject the Obama administrationâs plan to partially-fund the costly Tampa to Orlando high-speed rail project.
Â·Moments ago I spoke with u.s. transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to inform him of my decision. I appreciate the secretaryâs efforts to work with us and I look forward to working with him in the future.
Â·My decision to reject the project comes down to three main economic realities:
o First â capital cost overruns from the project could put Florida taxpayers on the hook for an additional $3 billion.
o Second â ridership and revenue projections are historically overly-optimistic and would likely result in ongoing subsidies that state taxpayers would have to incur. (from $300 million - $575 million over 10 years) â Note: The state subsidizes Tri-Rail $34.6 million a year while passenger revenues covers only $10.4 million of the $64 million annual operating budget.
o Finally â if the project becomes too costly for taxpayers and is shut down, the state would have to return the $2.4 billion in federal funds to D.C.
Â·The truth is that this project would be far too costly to taxpayers and I believe the risk far outweighs the benefits.
Â·Historical data shows capital cost overruns are pervasive in 9 out of 10 high speed rail projects and that 2/3 of those projects inflated ridership projections by an average of 65 percent of actual patronage.
Â·It is projected that 3.07 million people will use the train annually. Keep in mind that Amtrakâs Acela train in Washington, D.C., Boston, Philadelphia, New York and Baltimore only had 3.2 million riders in 2010. And that marketâs population is 8 times the size of the Tampa/Orlando market.
Â·President Obamaâs high-speed rail program is not the answer to Floridaâs economic recovery.
Â·We must make investments in areas where we will get a return for the shareholders â Floridaâs taxpayers.
Â·Rather than investing in a high-risk rail project, we should be focusing on improving our ports, rail and highway infrastructure to be in a position to attract the increased shipping that will result when the panama canal is expanded when the free trade agreements with Colombia and panama are ratified and with the expansion of the economies of central and south America.
Â·By capturing a larger share of containerized imports entering our seaports, expanding export markets for Florida businesses and emerging as a global hub for trade and investment we can create up to an additional 143,000 jobs according to a recent chamber of commerce study.
Â·It is absolutely critical that we make smart investments with taxpayer dollars, whether state or federal, and I believe our state will be better served by spending these funds on projects that will benefit Florida and not turn into a spending boondoggle.
Â·The answer is to reduce government spending, cut governmentâs leash on our stateâs job creators and then hold that government accountable for the investments it makes.
Â·That is what I was elected to do and that is how I plan to govern. Letâs get to work!comments powered by Disqus