A standing-room-only crowd of over 600 people came to hear philosopher-bioethicist, Peter Singer, in St. Pete Thursday night. Singer had been invited to Eckerd College to discuss the ethics of globalization. But some of the audience were more concerned about the ethics of Singer, himself.

Stan Davis was there and files this story.

[roll tape]

[Actuality 1-Richard & Kathy- “… I do not know whether equal time is being given… people like Adolph Hitler�]

Is Peter Singer Adolph Hitler? Many people in the SRO crowd Thursday night came to check him out for themselves.

Singer, a Philosopher and Professor in Bioethics at Princeton University, was last year named by Time Magazine as one of the “World’s 100 Most Influential People.�

Singer calls himself a Utilitarian, advocating a theory of morality that connects human actions to their effects and consequences. Others say Singer is simply an advocate of mass murder, using an academic’s cloak to justify so-called “mercy killings� of the disabled, the elderly, and the terminally ill.

Thursday evening, though, Singer wanted to talk about the ethics of Globalization. He began with Climate Change, specifically, “Global Warming…�

[roll tape]

[Actuality 2- Singer- “… The atmosphere, which we have long thought of as a limitless resource… and that’s why climate change is such a crucial ethical issue…�]

And then, he told his audience that Americans actually derive certain benefits from their contribution to climate change…

[roll tape]

[Actuality 3- “… what we’re getting from it… a large scale national selfishness…�]

The somewhat free-wheeling lecture then moved onto world poverty. Singer talked about economic justice using easy-to-understand analogies.

[roll tape]

[Actuality 4- Singer- “…27,000 children a day die of poverty … you’re gonna have to do something else…�]

And what can the people of the developed North do to save these children, in fact bring the entire world population out of poverty…

[roll tape]

[Actuality 5- Singer- “…it’s not hard to look around … seems to me something that is affordable�]

Singer also explained how Americans have no idea how much of their tax dollars actually go towards foreign aid.

Studies indicate that Americans think 20% of the US budget goes towards foreign aid. Those same studies reported that Americans would like to see this amount reduced to what they consider a fair 10%.

What most Americans do not know, however, is that less than 1% of their tax dollars actually goes towards foreign assistance…

[roll tape]

[Actuality 6- Singer “… we have an American public that is misinformed… or the one before, for that matter…�

Singer then took some questions from the audience, many of whom wanted to talk about some of his earlier pronouncements, likening his views on euthanasia to Hitler’s.

Perhaps Provocateur is a word that best describes Peter Singer, because even though his hackles rise when he hears himself compared to Hitler—all four of Singer’s grandparents were thrown into concentration camps—only one survived –Singer won’t back off his suggestion that newborns have no “right� to personhood.

Some 20 years ago, Singer wrote that when a child is born with extremely severe, life-threatening defects, it should be permissible—within its first 28 days of life—for the doctors to administer a lethal injection, if that’s what the parents wish.

Singer explained how he came to hold this belief…

[roll tape]

[Actuality 7- Singer- “ Back in the 1980s, I was director of a Bioethics center… justifiable to end a human life…�]

Towards the evening’s end, Singer did confess some contrition.

He wondered if his provocations about life and death ethics may be hampering his effectiveness in campaigning for the poor and for the rights of animals.

[roll tape]

[Actuality 8- Singer- “…it may be that I might be …actually more important causes…�]

By and large, the audience appreciated hearing what Peter Singer had to offer. They’d checked him out for themselves.

For WMNF, I’m Stan Davis

comments powered by Disqus