Tampa Bay area transit officials and business leaders hope to resuscitate rail
Looking to raise rail from the ashes of the November Second vote, Tampa Bay area transit leaders met at the Straz Center this morning to reflect on what theyâve learned. They discussed possible reasons the penny transit tax withered on Hillsboroughâs ballot, and speculated possible strategies for its future success.
Officials say thereâs no silver bullet that nails the reason Hillsborough County voters didnât buy into funding rail, bus and road improvements with a penny from every dollar they spend. Ronnie Duncan, chair of the Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA) board says voters didnât have a clear enough picture of what they would have been paying for.
"It's hard for me to sell you on something when I can't '...' and 'here's a bag, and I want to sell you this bag, and I want you to give me $50 bucks for it, but I can't quite tell you what's in the bag.' And what the voter's concerned about it is that I tell you what's in the bag, I tell you that it's got a tube of toothpaste in there and you get home, and you open the bag up, and you've already given me $50 bucks and oh, by the way, it's not toothpaste. It's deodorant."
Hillsborough County Commissioner Mark Sharpe is a Republican who put his reelection on the line by supporting the transit tax referendum â an idea most Republicans hated. He says transit advocates canât ignore the growing mistrust of government, especially when it comes to taxes.
"We will do ourselves and the voters a great disservice if we ignore what I believe is a very strong and growing sentiment in the nation with regards to spending."
Sharpe adds that the overload of information â not all of it true â further doomed the referendum. TBARTA Board chair Ronnie Duncan says the fact that a proposed high speed rail project, funded largely by federal stimulus dollars, was unveiled alongside the county transit tax was probably confusing to many voters.
"They thought that because the federal government has already given us $1.25 billion plus another 800 million for high speed rail, that we don't need...we already got our money. We don't need to be taxed anymore. Obviously they're two different issues but that's because I'm in the weeds on this everyday. The fact is that many people, they don't get it. They didn't get it."
Almost 60 percent of Hillsborough voters rejected the sales tax increase that would have funded the overhaul. Still, transit advocates are convinced that voters want newer, greener ways to get around â they just arenât sure the option presented to them was the best way to do it. Duncan says a well-rounded transit system would be an economic boon to the Tampa Bay area.
"I don't think there can be any question that we're at a competitive disadvantage without a well-developed public transit system, including light rail, for many reasons. For one thing 25-30 other metropolitan areas like ours have it, and we don't. And when businesses are looking for a place to move or where they're thinking about staying, they look at the areas investment in infrastructure, our committment to progress, our committment to business, giving them the support they need to move their people, to move their business services."
Former Hillsborough County Commissioner Ed Turanchik, who is currently running for Tampa mayor, was in the audience this morning. An avid supporter of transit, he says he thinks the measure failed because it wasnât regional and focused too heavily on light rail.
"Voters were right to say no. It was too much tax and too expensive of a plan, and it just has to take a step back and rethink it. It needs to be more expansive. I think we need a regional, simple and affordable bus and rail transit plan. And the reason this plan was so expensive is it was so reliant on light rail which is turning out to be as expensive as highways."
The Pinellas County Transit Task Force said Monday it may seek a referendum on a transit sales tax over the multi-county region in the next few years. But Commissioner Mark Sharpe says he agrees that tackling transit should be a region-wide endeavor, but that winning hearts and minds of voters needs to be done at the local level.
The small counties will say 'why do I want to build a rail system that I'm never going to see, that's going to go somewhere else'. And when voters in the eastern part of our own county said 'wait a minute', because the anti-rail folks were very effective at making this a 'this a tax for rail in Tampa.' And they are the ones that really drilled down it's us versus them which I've never bought into. But that was the case they made effectively."
For now, Hillsborough transit leaders are laying low. On Monday, Hillsborough Area Regional Transit, or (HART), board members agreed to cool off on any forward motion for its countywide transit plan in order to figure out what the voters want. But HART Board chair Ron Govin says a number of potential transit plan options have come to light in the couple of weeks since voters turned down the transit tax.
"We've had some great communications with the airport and there's a unique opportunity there where we could cross through their property and perhaps build a demonstration line that would connect to downtown, and it would be at a lower expense."
The Tampa Bay Area Regional Transit Authority, meanwhile, will have its monthly board meeting Friday morning. TBARTA chair Ronnie Duncan says the board will discuss some potential new partnerships that may add up to a game changer when it comes to the organizationâs regional transit plan. Cities that have had transit tax referenda fail before passing include Austin, Texas and Phoenix.comments powered by Disqus